🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has developed a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass functions where individuals of African heritage are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A effort to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is under way. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the month symbolises how little it can be effective if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as various establishments are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the past when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that impact society if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.